tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post2836115776221358603..comments2023-08-23T10:07:13.932-05:00Comments on Thomas Robb: Private Education Under AttackThomashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11215699820993025882noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-34460495003876716242009-05-02T12:02:00.000-05:002009-05-02T12:02:00.000-05:00The original liberalism was born when the old Euro...The original liberalism was born when the old European monarchies discovered that they could not forcibly impose a State Religion on a nation that was deeply divided between large groups of Catholics and Protestants.<br /><br />It now means having a planet without national borders and seeks a one world government and monetary system. Modern 'liberalism' is the opposite of the original liberalism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-79796259676331461042009-05-01T17:11:00.000-05:002009-05-01T17:11:00.000-05:00Thank you Pastor Robb. You took the words right o...Thank you Pastor Robb. You took the words right out of my mouth. Liberalism today in my view is being pro-gay, pro-abortion, anti-gun, anti-private schools, anti-Christian.Andrewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-70138031518162545582009-05-01T08:42:00.000-05:002009-05-01T08:42:00.000-05:00Dear Poster at 7:20 AM
I read your message and you...Dear Poster at 7:20 AM<br />I read your message and you are right about the original meaning of the word liberal. And i think most people on this blog would agree with you. But alas! times changes things. Where I think you are mistaken is in this word liberalism. <br />Liberal is one of those words that has been stolen from the English language and redefined. Another word given a new meaning is gay.<br />In the historical context a liberal was indeed someone who promoted personal freedom. However, that definition has long been discarded and those who today wear the liberal label are promoters of big government which suppresses the unalienable rights of the people. Today liberalism attacks gun ownership, home schools, property rights, free speech, personal incentive and a free market economy. They even want to control what kind of light bulbs I use. Today liberalism is about control of the citizen through big government.<br />Socialism is another such word that has been redefined. It has mutated from a general conscious of the people to socially interact for the overall good of the people into today's meaning which is forced leveling of production and consumption. It is today a close kin of Marxism, "From each according to their ability to each according to their need."<br />When government, through modern liberalism, socialism and communism, force this objective upon people then tyrants rules and liberty lays naked in the streets.<br />Thank you for writing.Thomas Robbnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-33473390489400401972009-05-01T07:20:00.000-05:002009-05-01T07:20:00.000-05:00I dont believe I have ever head anything more stup...I dont believe I have ever head anything more stupid in my life than the suggestion that liberalism doesn't promote freedom. You obviously have no idea what liberalism means and have no business writing on a political wall. Read some Kant and some Mill and maybe come back. Plus Liberalism and SOCIALISM have absolutely NOTHING to do with one another!!! Where on EARTH did you learn that???!! Capitalism is based on Liberalism; the right to private property, freedom of speech etc. without liberalism, capitalism could not function, they are intrinsically linked to one another. Socialism is based on common ownership, and the limitation of wealth etc. which are NOT liberal values. To try and connect the two amounts to the same thing as saying that Christ was pro abortion. You dont know what your talking about, you are badly informed and obviously follow the rediculous right wing propaganda in the media without taking enough interest in these interests yourself to do some proper research. If it weren't for the fact that pastor Robb just said he wouldn't post comments that involve name calling I would call you something insulting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-45430538088116905742009-04-30T21:20:00.000-05:002009-04-30T21:20:00.000-05:00I agree the forefathers of this nation did not wan...I agree the forefathers of this nation did not want the Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, Islam or whatever church to be in charge over this nation. That did not mean they were atheists. They just did not want a state religious governing body.Pastor John Mullandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-38927550856452120602009-04-30T15:24:00.000-05:002009-04-30T15:24:00.000-05:00Is anything more a threat to Liberalism than Chris...Is anything more a threat to Liberalism than Christianity? Christianity is freedom. Christianity is choice. Liberalism promotes filth. Pornography, homosexuality, adultery, abortion. Socialism is binding it is not free. The more we get from our government the more freedom we lose. They want us to believe this lie that our forefathers were not Christians they wanted nothing to do with religion in government. This is a big fat lie.Andrewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6686067344745953769.post-32446868402350839652009-04-30T14:31:00.000-05:002009-04-30T14:31:00.000-05:00Amen they do not want Christ taught in schools!Amen they do not want Christ taught in schools!Pastor John Mullandnoreply@blogger.com