Wednesday, September 2, 2009

THE HOMOSEXUALIZING OF AMERICA

By Forret Nordic

According to an Internet archive, back on 17 January, 2006, on the Larry King Live show, the mainstream media suggested to American television viewers that a new era in American life was unfolding. Hollywood had just granted four Oscar nominations to a motion picture about "gay" cowboys--two men who fall in love--who also somehow got married to women and had children before the end of the story. The film: "Brokeback Mountain."A conservative Christian radio host, Janet Parshall, warned that to her this signaled "the homosexualizing of America."

Now, I have not seen this motion picture, but Jewish television host Larry King repeatedly suggested to Ms. Parshall that one cannot learn by looking away from, rather than at, Hollywood productions such as this.

For you see, according to radical liberals like King, conservative Americans are "ignorant" and desperately need Hollywood to instruct them and open their minds to new ideas and new realities. (Immediately after Barack Hussein Obama was elected president, King opined with glee that perhaps the next president would be a lesbian woman -- possibly an Asian (on that racial detail, I cannot recall with certainty--but I believe he said "Asian").

There was also a Christian on the program, the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, no less. And the Jewish host had the audacity to ask him this question: "Does it disturb you that apparently there's no record of Christ having had a heterosexual relationship?"

I'll leave it to the reader to infer what Mr. King was suggesting.

Mr. King even had enough "attitude" to ask Reverend Mohler this loaded question (nearly every question he asks is loaded): "Sex--why is it a sin to have sex if it's so beautiful? . . . I mean outside of marriage, gay sex, outside of marriage sex. It's a beautiful thing. Who does it harm?" Just think of the Frankfurt School floodgates this attitude can open!

In thinking about the most recent political event on this subject, I was reminded of this particular LKL broadcast. In the original broadcast, which I saw on television, the comment was made that at one time Blacks could not legally marry Whites, and that this was a good parallel to, and justification for, "gay marriage." Somehow these words did not make it into the transcript.

Also missing from the transcript is the comment I can remember of actor Chad Allen that, prior to the media raising the issue of "gay marriage," he did not care about the subject. But since it had been raised and brought to the attention of the public , he decided to support it because he did not want to settle for anything less than "equality."



If you, the reader, would like to read the entire transcript, you may find it online here: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0601/17/lkl.01.html

Of greatest concern just now is the fresh action taken in several states to legally recognize and celebrate same-sex "marriages."

The state of Vermont is the latest to enact legislation enabling same-sex couples to "marry."Once again, the argument is that of "equality." In my opinion, this is merely the continuation of the march of the "Civil Rights Movement" of the late 1950s and the 1960s.

This news item is presented here:

http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20090901/US.Gay.Marriage/

I think the lesson to carry from this are the words of the Jew, Larry King: "Jesus is not in the Constitution." If these words do not demonstrate clearly that having Jews in positions of great power and influence is not a challenge in any Christian society, I do not know what can.

24 comments:

  1. Does being a fag or a negro or Asian or a Jew make you a better politician? To these morons it does! Obama could get NY nuked and they would still say he is a great president. To them it matters who wins only in color.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We are definately in the final days. The anti-Christ is taking his foothold.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Homosexuality, like heterosexuality, has always been a part of nature. Some people are gay. Get over it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Im Gay, and Asian and a great politician. Should I be held back because of how I was born. No.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WHAT? Homosexuality is a part of nature? Homosexuality is against nature! God made us to "Be fruitful and multiply." Not to be perverse and have sex with anything you see. That is why there are laws in the bible about who you can and cannot have sex with. If you say that homosexuality is part of nature then pedophilia can be part of nature too. Incest can be part of nature. They are not. The bible is clear on what you should and should not do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You were born Asian but you were not born Gay. Homosexuality is a pyschologocial problem not something you are born with. Here is proof. There is a minister who was gay and came to Christ seeing the error of his ways. Explain that.
    Here is his website:

    www.sbministries.org

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are quite right. The bible does condemn homosexuality as an abomination and you are quite right for denouncing it. Here are some of the other things that the bible says (in the same book as 18:22). Could you please put a tick next to your name for each of these you abide by and if not, why you dont and what makes the bit about homosexuality so much more special.
    'When an alien who resides with you in your land, you shalll not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself'-19:33,34
    'If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall be put to death' - 20:10
    'You shall not let your animals breed with a different kind; you shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed; nor shall you put on a garment made of two different materials' - 19:19
    'You shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely; and you shall not lie to one another.' 19:11
    'You shall not eat anything with its blood. you shall not practice augury or witchcraft. you shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard. You shall not make any gashes in your flesh for the dead or tattoo any marks upon you: I am the Lord' - 19:26-28

    I am verging on believing and coming to Christ. I am so so so close to finding God but I need that little extra push. What I can't understand at the moment (and what is sort of holding me back) is why some of Gods commandments are taken to be more valid than other. Could anyone, if possible Pastor Robb, enlighten me. If I can find a satisfactory answer to my question than I can finally put my doubts to rest and become a Christian.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Though I agree with Lutheran that homosexuality is not entirely a part of nature, the larger question is that things that are part of nature are not necessarily morally right for human beings.

    For example, a male cat sometimes will, given the chance, kill his own kittens. Now clearly this is not right for human beings, whether or not this is considered a "part of nature."

    Two men may both love the same woman and seek her hand in marriage. When she makes her choice (provided that she loves one of them and to marry him), the rejected one might wish to murder his rival, the "winner," but this, even if called "natural" would definitely be morally wrong. (Reminds me of the old song, "Take Good Care of Her.")

    The point: Natural Law is not the Highest Law.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In answer to your question Anon sept 4th. None of us are perfect. If we were not sinners we would not need Jesus. But we do need Jesus. Jesus is our salvation. He came for the forgivness of sins. So that he who believes in Him may be saved. Nothing you do can save your soul. That is why Jesus was given to us. If you are truly serious about Christ then I suggest that you go find yourself a bible based church and talk to the Pastor.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "For example, a male cat sometimes will, given the chance, kill his own kittens. Now clearly this is not right for human beings, whether or not this is considered a "part of nature."

    I get this argument a lot from homosexuals. Well an animal will do it that makes it ok for us. Are you not more than a dog? Do you have more intelligence than some beast? Humans were given a conscience. Beasts do not have one.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Lutheran that answer could not be further away from being satisfactory. You just gave out a whole load of generic BS that didnt even attempt to address the question (or even the spirit of the question) asked. I sense that you are hiding something here.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Also i would just like to point out that the argument that you make means that Homosexuals are no worse than the rest of us!! So why single them out? Is their sin worse?

    ReplyDelete
  13. While your down burning in hell for being a hateful old moron, I wonder if you will find the irony funny at some point so the humor might (for a moment) overcome the pain of the hellfire.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous said: "'When an alien who resides with you in your land, you shalll not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself'-19:33,34"

    Since when do we oppress aliens in this country. The don't pay income tax. They get free medicaid, food stamps, and welfare. They don't have to speak English. Everytime I call someplace I have to press "1" for English. They have it better than the citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To Anonymous September 4, 2009 10:09 AM

    I think what makes it so special is that it is a hot topic in the media right now. It will change our society as a whole more than whether or not people wear clothes made of 2 different materials or if a farmers mixes up his seeds in the field. A lot of Christians don't ever read the Bible so they don't have a clue what's in it. They just rely on what their pastor tells them. There are a lot of different sects in Christianity that believe a lot of different things, so I'm sure you'll get plenty of different answers to your question. On the other hand, that's how it is with every other major religion in this world. I am glad to see that you are reading the Bible and trying to make sense of it for yourself so that you can make an informed decision. Good luck in your religious journey.

    ReplyDelete
  16. While your down burning in hell for being a hateful old moron, I wonder if you will find the irony funny at some point so the humor might (for a moment) overcome the pain of the hellfire.

    OH WHO IS JUDGING NOW?

    ReplyDelete
  17. "Lutheran that answer could not be further away from being satisfactory. You just gave out a whole load of generic BS that didnt even attempt to address the question (or even the spirit of the question) asked. I sense that you are hiding something here."

    Oh here we go! Typical liberal. If you are against homosexuality then you are hiding homosexual feelings. Sigmund Freud was an idiot. What a load of crap. If this is true then Paul and Moses are homosexuals. Doubt it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I never said anything along those lines! you just made that up. Typical ultra conservative, always jumping to rash, illogical conclusions! What i meant was that you seem like you are hiding the fact that you do not in reality have a satisfactory answer to the question. That the sin of homosexuality in the eyes of God is no worse than the sin of wearing clothes made out of two different types of material. I meant that your being evasive to the question, and looking at your determination to change the subject and the fact that neither you or anyone else on this blog has attempted anything even coming close to a reasonable explanation means that there is no answer and that in actual fact your hatred of homosexuals is self harboured and simply justified by a scant selective reading (although I doubt you've read it) of the bible. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE prove me wrong I beg you

    ReplyDelete
  19. I don't post on my own blog very often. But I will interject a comment here to the poster above who says the Bible doesn’t say being a Sodomite is worse than wearing mix clothing. Then asked Lutheran to prove him wrong. I don’t know about Lutheran, but as for my self, I have no inner need to prove him wrong, nature has already done that.

    ReplyDelete
  20. So you think the sin of someone like a priest or a pastor that molests boys are equal to the sin of a common shoplifter?

    ReplyDelete
  21. First of all I do not hate homosexuals. Hate the sin not the sinner. I have met a few people who claimed themselves to gay and they were nice people. Yet I do not want to hear about their relationships with other homosexuals because I find this offensive. You liberals are always so worried about offending minorities yet you do not care if you offend a Christian. Hypocrites!

    ReplyDelete
  22. "Also i would just like to point out that the argument that you make means that Homosexuals are no worse than the rest of us!! So why single them out? Is their sin worse?"

    Jesus mentioned that just because He is saving you does not give us a free ticket to sin all we want. If you truly follow Jesus then you follow His ways. Because this pleases Him.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The Bible lists several sins based on sex and almost all of them end in death. Homosexuality, incest, and beastiality all end in death.

    Sex with an in-law ends in being exiled from the people. Now why should we be forced to live among those whom God had deemed to die for their sins and since they should be put to death then Christ's sacrifice can not cleanse these sins. Honor thy parents. And Christ absolving homosexuals of their sins goed directly against God and Christ was not about to disrespect his Father in that way. That would have meant breaking one of the ten commandments.

    Allowing Gays to marry and telling people they have to let the Gays defile America and to tell people they have to accept the filthy lifestyles of Gays is forcing us to bear false witness(lie) in saying that homosexuality is OK when the Bible clearly says it is not.

    ReplyDelete
  24. People have celebrations for marriage. It is the lifelong (or used to be) commitment between a man and a woman. How many people celebrate when they hear their son or daughter is gay?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.