Monday, October 11, 2010

Do You Have Love?

On October 9th I wrote on my blog an entry titled Love Your Heritage. You can read it below. I received several anti comments which you can read by a click to the comment button at the Love Your Heritage article.

I am confident that if I were black and wrote Love Your Heritage these same people who were against my current article would love it.

Here in abbreviated form are some of the comments.

“A successful argument can be made that people with your belief system have been given over to strong delusions.”
Let me get this straight - I am under strong delusion for loving my people? - but your not because you don't have this love?
******** ********
"Robb I'm sorry but this is possibly THE silliest argument you've had in a while. "
Is it really silly for a white person to love their people? - Have you really thought about what you said?
******** ********
"I'm truly afraid that you are serious with your beliefs Robb... I just read some of the articles you have on your site and I'm appalled."
It is appalling for someone to love their people? - That seems a little strange! Is is equally apalling for a black person to love other black people?
******** ********

"But I also believe that you are a false prophet preaching a false message."
Is that how you identify a false prophet - by how much love they have for their people?
******** ********
"My prayer for you Thomas is that you will someday have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and will know the peace that can only come from knowing the King of Kings."
Because I promote love of our people this person has decided that I am not a Christian. He seems to forget that the Bible is quite clear that our salvation is in the blood atonement of Jesus Christ - not how much I agree with his teachings of the Bible. Acts 4:12 “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.”

Strong delusion is truly upon our people. What kind of spirit enters a man that causes him to have so little regard for his people? This is a new phenomena that has come upon the church over the last 30 years. Young people have no idea of this change, they think this is the way it has always been. We are watching our people die and they simply don’t care then they try to justify their apathy with Scripture.

The same filthy Hollywood industry which promote drugs, abortion, promiscuity and trashes Jesus Christ at every opportunity is also the same industry that is promoting anti-white propaganda and encourages miscegenation. Unfortunately modern Christians have confused Christian love with political correctness.

If you watch this video and still don't have any concern for our people then there is nothing that can be done for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk09gSu3HlY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtg18aDlI1c&feature=related

Are you brave enough to watch?

12 comments:

Mekibos said...

Ok Robb we get it you love White people. Theres nothing wrong with that. Whats wrong is you try to use scripture as a means of keeping races seperated. There isn't any thing in the bible that you've given me that states races can't be united, inter-marry, etc. Of course I will add that intermarried couples do tend to seperate faster than same race ones, but should we oust the people who do make those decisions?

Mekibos said...

Also I love being White its just I don't agree with some of the things you've stated on your site or your blogs. That doesn't mean I have hate in my heart for my own race. I just disagree with you.

I honestly don't see white people every disappering of the face of the earth.(unless of course everyone becomes some deluted mix of all races) Because there will always be people who think the way you do. Why do you think the native americans still survive, the chose not to cross races.

Anonymous said...

If a black leader was using his influence to invoke guilt in those who make decisions not to his liking in matters that are personal and not of his business, then yes, I would be against his message.
If this black leader was insisting that any black people that did not follow his example were traitors to their race, lacked love for their race, or hated their race, I would deny the validity of his message.
If a black leader was telling other black people to love their race at the expense of other people, to use their heritage as an excuse for resenting or hating others, manipulating scripture to justify the desire for power over others, or to opress and abuse others, thereby promoting greater disunity amongst the American people and their neighbors, then yes, I would oppose such a message. I don't believe "love" is meant to tear a nation apart. If you truly believe those that open up to all races of people, accept all peaceful, proactive ways of life, and moreover promote a brand of compassion that transcends racial and cultural divides are actually possessive of some form of hatred for white people, you're hopelessly lost. Your perception of what love should be is pathetically one-dimensional. I dare you to explore thinking outside the box, for once.

Nordic2005 said...

Anonymous at 9:20,

You only justify yourself. You haven't even bothered to comment on the video presentation linked to! They say "There are two side to every argument," but you are discourteous in not looking at ours, as presented in the video clips. I'm very disappointed in you.

Anonymous said...

"There isn't any thing in the bible that you've given me that states races can't be united, inter-marry, etc."
-----------------------
Read in Genesis about the Tower of Babel.

Also Ezra 9, verses 2 and 12 (among others):

"2 "They have taken some of their daughters as wives for themselves and their sons, and have mingled the holy race with the peoples around them. And the leaders and officials have led the way in this unfaithfulness."

12 Therefore, do not give your daughters in marriage to their sons or take their daughters for your sons. Do not seek a treaty of friendship with them at any time, that you may be strong and eat the good things of the land and leave it to your children as an everlasting inheritance.' "

And Daniel 2:

43"And in that you saw the iron mixed with common clay, they will combine with one another in the seed of men [ = miscegenation or intermarriage]; but they will not adhere to one another, even as iron does not combine with pottery.

Anonymous said...

Pastor Robb - BINGO

Nordic2005 said...

"Unfortunately modern Christians have confused Christian love with political correctness."
----------------------------
That's the problem in a nutshell! Wish I had said that!

Anonymous said...

Excuse me Nordic, but I did view both videos in their entirety. My response wasaimed at TR's words, bubt if you wanna talk videos, we'll talk videos.
Neither of these arguments were new to me. Adding music and media clips did little to convince me, that any critical thought is being applied to the issues and statistics being dragged up. But go ahead, if you consider yourself so much more informed--so much more in tune with reality--what sort of fix do you suggest? What do we do about the rampant media bias and pervasive use of sex?
I agree that social media can and does have a detrimental effect on children. I think it is up to parents to educate their kids--to teach them the important difference between reality and fantasies promoted by the larger public. I don't recognize a multicultural bias as the main concern, as multiculturalism is an American trait, and those that have accepted that don't find a problem with it. I have a deep disdain for shallow advertising, and because of this, I choose to refrain from watching TV. If you don't like what's on TV, don't watch. If you don't want your young children exposed to the evils of sex and multiculturalism found in the media, don't employ the media as a babysitter or surrogate. RAISE your kids, teach them responsibility, not angst and resentment.

On a side note, there is far more sexual content in the first video than what my normal daily routine would have allowed me exposure to--somewhat ironic that the family values proponents are my main source of illicit influence. I thought the editing could have been more selective in the included clips, lessening the ammount of potentially offensive material, shortening the runtime, while not taking anything away from the overall aurgument.

Anonymous said...

What solution to you propose for the problem of black crime? What does the KKK or Knights Party suggest as a reasonable, constructive solution?

Anonymous said...

Nordic: Regarding anonymous at 9:59 AM - It appears he still doesn't get it. He seems to only have a concern about his family and his kids and therefore suggests that if someone doesn't like the sexual content they can turn the TV off. He apparently has no concern about the growing depravity of our culture.

Also his comments are self-evident that he has loss his racial integrity and his only concern was in the immoral sexual content and does not evern "see" the attack upon our race.

He has no concern for our race. He simply does not care and this is the whole point of Pastor Robb's recent blog. By showing he doesn't care proves Pastor Robb is right regarding the brainwashing of our people.

It amazing that those who DON'T CARE about our race have such anger for those of us who DO!

Nordic2005 said...

Anonymous at 11:03 AM

Yes, a society cannot remain moral if its institutions promote immorality. Liberals lead self-centered lives, so they fail to notice this obvious truth.

Plato, for example, in "The Republic," says that children (adults, for that matter) should not learn music with immoral content. Plato actually advocated moral censorship -- but Liberals do not believe in that, of course. For the Liberal, the only immorality is something that keeps him from having his own way.

Here a psychologist explains why the morally weak in society need moral support and encouragement from those who are stronger (which is to say, the accepted CULTURE):

People Need Cultural Support

Nordic2005 said...

To the extent that my words and actions have a moral influence on an impressionable child, I am responsible for that child. I have no right to teach my neighbor's child immoral behaviors.

All responsible adults play a part in teaching children right from wrong, not just the parents. (Indeed, sometimes a particular child will learn a good (or bad) behavior from an adult he or she respects and admires, rather than the parents -- especially when the child is not properly honored by just plain unkind and unloving parents.)

This shared responsibility is called public morality. What the French call "les mœurs" -- that is, the ways, manners, and customs of a society: its mores, to use the Latin term.

Television is a very public medium. It carries the stamp of public approval. It has an aura of moral authority -- especially for impressionable children (and adults).