Now here is a clip you need to watch. Is the end of the white race near?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMKcRGJqmuY
Monday, August 9, 2010
Friday, August 6, 2010
Religious Freedom?
Pictured here are two young “Texas” girls who were brutally murdered by their father in some kind of weird honor killing.

Honor killings are usually committed against girls and women if the man feels that they have disgraced the family.
The girls are sisters, Amina and Sarah, daughters of Yaser Said.
Patricia Said married Egyptian Yaser Said when she was 15 and has endured a 20 year marriage which was often abusive. Yaser disappeared the day of the January 1, 2008 murders. According to Yaser’s American born wife, they were murdered because they were dating boys who were not Muslim. The FBI has no trace of where he might be.
Such honor killings are endorsed by Sharia Law, the code of conduct which devote Muslims faithfully obey.
Is this what’s coming to America?
If I can be the “Devil’s advocate” for a moment. We are hounded by both ignorant liberals and ignorant conservatives that America is a a land of religions freedom. We are told that ALL religions are free in America. If that is the case then WHO ARE WE to outlaw Sharia Law - that is their religion! Who are we to outlaw voodooism or that strange Chinese religion that says when a man dies his wife has no more value and is buried alive along with her departed husband.
I am showing another photo of a young girl who had her nose cut off because her husband said she disgraced h
im. Again another example of Sharia Law. Islam is protected by our first amendment rights because Americans have been fooled into believing that America is a land of freedom for all religions.
The fact is, our founding fathers were Christians and established Christian government. The religious freedom spoken of by the founders allowed people of various Christian denominations to practice their faith unencumbered by those of another Christian denomination. The founding fathers wanted to protect America from the kind of religious intolerance that often existed in Europe especially of that which existed between Catholicism and Protestantism.
"Religious Freedom," "Constitutionally protected First Amendment Rights?" As we allow more and more racial aliens into our country with their strange religions, don’t be surprised that such legal arguments will be made before the courts.
The title of this Time Magazine cover story is, What Happens if We Leave Afghanistan should be What Happens if Islam and Sharia Law Comes to the United States?

Honor killings are usually committed against girls and women if the man feels that they have disgraced the family.
The girls are sisters, Amina and Sarah, daughters of Yaser Said.
Patricia Said married Egyptian Yaser Said when she was 15 and has endured a 20 year marriage which was often abusive. Yaser disappeared the day of the January 1, 2008 murders. According to Yaser’s American born wife, they were murdered because they were dating boys who were not Muslim. The FBI has no trace of where he might be.
Such honor killings are endorsed by Sharia Law, the code of conduct which devote Muslims faithfully obey.
Is this what’s coming to America?
If I can be the “Devil’s advocate” for a moment. We are hounded by both ignorant liberals and ignorant conservatives that America is a a land of religions freedom. We are told that ALL religions are free in America. If that is the case then WHO ARE WE to outlaw Sharia Law - that is their religion! Who are we to outlaw voodooism or that strange Chinese religion that says when a man dies his wife has no more value and is buried alive along with her departed husband.
I am showing another photo of a young girl who had her nose cut off because her husband said she disgraced h
im. Again another example of Sharia Law. Islam is protected by our first amendment rights because Americans have been fooled into believing that America is a land of freedom for all religions.The fact is, our founding fathers were Christians and established Christian government. The religious freedom spoken of by the founders allowed people of various Christian denominations to practice their faith unencumbered by those of another Christian denomination. The founding fathers wanted to protect America from the kind of religious intolerance that often existed in Europe especially of that which existed between Catholicism and Protestantism.
"Religious Freedom," "Constitutionally protected First Amendment Rights?" As we allow more and more racial aliens into our country with their strange religions, don’t be surprised that such legal arguments will be made before the courts.
The title of this Time Magazine cover story is, What Happens if We Leave Afghanistan should be What Happens if Islam and Sharia Law Comes to the United States?
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Days of Lot are Upon Us!
On Wednesday, a federal judge in California struck down Proposition 8 which banned same sex marriage. The Proposition was approved by California voters in November 2008 after the California Supreme Court legalized marriage between Sodomites. The decison caused sodomites to celebrate outside of the courthouse. Vaseline was in short supply.It is not surprising that U.S. District Judge Vaugh Walker declared the law to be unconstitutional because the judge is one of three openly sodomite judges in the federal court system.
"Our courts are supposed to protect our Constitutional rights," lead plaintiff Kris Perry said as Sandy Stier, her partner of 10 years, stood at her side. "Today, they did."
Jesus Christ told us in Luke 17:26-28 that the two great sins that would come upon us in the end time would be miscegenation (race-mixing) and sodomy. (I detail this in length in my book, The Last Church. You can get this by sending a $5.00 offering to: Christian Revival Center, P.O. Box 354, Bergman, AR 72615 - ask for the book by name.)
We are about to take the final step. The first step was the acceptance of miscegenation which came out of the 60’s and the activities of Martin Luther King (Days of Noah). Now we are about to have Sodomy legalized in “gay” “marriages.” (Days of Lot!)
The decision is going to be appealed to the 9th District court where it is certain to be upheld and then to the U.S. Supreme court. The U.S. Supreme court is almost certain to support Judge Vaugh Walkers ruling. Here is how the Supreme Court is likely to rule. The Jewish lesbian Elena Kagan who is certain to become the next Supreme Court justice along with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor are likely to support sodomite “marriages.” Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Antonin G. Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel A. Alito will most certainly vote against the ruling of the California homosexual judge. That will give the swing vote to Anthony M. Kennedy who has in the past favored homosexual issues demanding “equality.”
That means when this comes out of the Supreme Court there will be a 5 to 4 decision striking down any laws, nation wide which prohibits gay “marriages.”
When that happens America will become Queer Nation.
As with the issue of miscegenation, within one generation most churches, fearful of losing tax exemption, will fully embrace homosexuality as they have race-mixing.
We have become a dictatorship of the courts. The people no longer rule their own nation.
Monday, August 2, 2010
No Thank You!
I often do interviews with the media and usually get pretty good stories. Of course, occasionally I do get sucker punched. For example about two years ago I did an interview with Al Jazeera Television. It was beyond horrible! That sometimes happens, although it is rare. Most stories could be better, but they could also be a lot worse. The Newsweek story last year was fairly good, though there were certainly room for improvement.
I have learned to simply brush myself off and move on. If you are going to get in the fray it is expected that occasionally you will get punched.
The National Geographic piece from a few years ago was very good. Some where around an 8 or 9.
But I have also turned down others. Serious news agencies will usually get my nod. However television talk shows are always a “No.” We have turned down Jerry Springer so many times I would think they would get tired of calling. I recall one time time years ago one of the shows called and wanted to do a story on young mothers who will raise their children to be White Nationalists. After speaking with them for a few moments the truth came out. They wanted young girls (14 or 15) who were unmarried and pregnant. Obviously that discussion went no where!
Recently Spike TV called and wanted to do a story. I was told it was to be a new show they were putting together. I am willing to listen and so told them that I would be available for their interview
Today I received their contract which, if I signed, would allow them to film interviews and permission for use of location. The contract said it was for the Greg Giraldo project. Pictured.

That was all I needed to know. Greg Giraldo is a stand up insult comic. It was obvious that there was no serious intent in the show.
I am placing below a copy of the letter to me from Justin Paul a producer for the show and my reply.
I thought you would find it interesting.
_________
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:30:35 -0700
Subject: Spike TV Shoot
Pastor Robb,
Jake Holmes forwarded me your email address - I wanted to get in touch with you regarding our upcoming visit to Harrison for our Spike TV show shoot on Friday, August 13.
Can you send me an address of where we will be meeting you for mapping purposes? As we get closer to the date, I will be able to give you an approximate time of our arrival to you.
Also, please find attached a copy of our location release, which grants us permission to come to your property with our cameras to videotape the interview. You can fill this out and scan/email or fax it back to me at the number below. We can provide you with a copy of our certificate of insurance if you require it.
Please note that you or anyone who appears on camera will have to sign an appearance release. Anyone under 18 who appears must have parental consent.
If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Thank you very much for your time and we look forward to meeting you on August 13.
Justin Paul
Coordinating Producer
State Penn Productions
I have learned to simply brush myself off and move on. If you are going to get in the fray it is expected that occasionally you will get punched.
The National Geographic piece from a few years ago was very good. Some where around an 8 or 9.
But I have also turned down others. Serious news agencies will usually get my nod. However television talk shows are always a “No.” We have turned down Jerry Springer so many times I would think they would get tired of calling. I recall one time time years ago one of the shows called and wanted to do a story on young mothers who will raise their children to be White Nationalists. After speaking with them for a few moments the truth came out. They wanted young girls (14 or 15) who were unmarried and pregnant. Obviously that discussion went no where!
Recently Spike TV called and wanted to do a story. I was told it was to be a new show they were putting together. I am willing to listen and so told them that I would be available for their interview
Today I received their contract which, if I signed, would allow them to film interviews and permission for use of location. The contract said it was for the Greg Giraldo project. Pictured.

That was all I needed to know. Greg Giraldo is a stand up insult comic. It was obvious that there was no serious intent in the show.
I am placing below a copy of the letter to me from Justin Paul a producer for the show and my reply.
I thought you would find it interesting.
_________
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:30:35 -0700
Subject: Spike TV Shoot
Pastor Robb,
Jake Holmes forwarded me your email address - I wanted to get in touch with you regarding our upcoming visit to Harrison for our Spike TV show shoot on Friday, August 13.
Can you send me an address of where we will be meeting you for mapping purposes? As we get closer to the date, I will be able to give you an approximate time of our arrival to you.
Also, please find attached a copy of our location release, which grants us permission to come to your property with our cameras to videotape the interview. You can fill this out and scan/email or fax it back to me at the number below. We can provide you with a copy of our certificate of insurance if you require it.
Please note that you or anyone who appears on camera will have to sign an appearance release. Anyone under 18 who appears must have parental consent.
If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Thank you very much for your time and we look forward to meeting you on August 13.
Justin Paul
Coordinating Producer
State Penn Productions
Here is my short reply
Dear Mr. Paul:
I am in receipt of the contract that was sent to our office and I forwarded it to our attorney for review. I have been advised that the nature of Greg Giraldo is to perform insult comedy etc. In previous communication I was under the impression that this project was in pursuit of a serious news story. In as much as this is not the case, I am declining your offer. Thank you! . . . Thomas Robb
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Not a Surprise!
Ok! It shouldn't’t be a surprise. A federal judge has declared most of the Arizona law to be unconstitutional. According to our custom we all are suppose to bow before the court’s ruling. However, we often fail to understand that the court is not the highest branch of government ruling over all others. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC with three branches of government. All EQUAL! It is the Constitution and not the court that is the supreme law of the land. The court has no constitutional authority to force its will upon the legislative or executive branches of government. Likewise the legislature cannot force its will upon the court. In other words, congress cannot pass a law forcing the court on how it should rule. Even so, Constitutionally the court does not have authority to force its will upon the legislature. The Arizona law (SB1070) was passed by the legislature of the state and the enforcement of the law is carried out by the governor (executive). The court has an opinion-that’s all they have. If they are able to force their opinion against the will of the legislature and the will of the executive then we not longer a republic but an oligarchy dictatorship of the court.
Each branch of government has equal power. The legislature passes laws, the executive branch carries out laws passed by the legislature and the court gives their opinion. The executive is not authorized to force court opinion on the people or else we live in a dictatorship and the will of the people is under the heel of tyranny.
Each branch of government has equal power. The legislature passes laws, the executive branch carries out laws passed by the legislature and the court gives their opinion. The executive is not authorized to force court opinion on the people or else we live in a dictatorship and the will of the people is under the heel of tyranny.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Defense Against Invasion
The State of Arizona has been sued by the Obama administration because the citizens of Arizona feel the need to safe guard their borders. Obama and others deny that Arizona has that right.
But what DOES our U. S. Constitution say? Take a look!
Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
But what DOES our U. S. Constitution say? Take a look!
Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Is Tom Vilsack a Secret Racist?
We certainly have now heard the story of Shirley Sherrod’s dismissal from the Department of Agriculture. She was the black women who while speaking before the NAACP in March revealed racist feelings she had while dealing with a white farmer over 20 years ago. A video tape of her speech was shown on Biggovernment.org which immediately resulted in her dismissal by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
Sherrod, however, contested the tape, claiming that the full content of the tape eventually shows that she eventually came to terms with those racist feelings and helped the white farmer that was seeking assistance.
Andrew Breitbart, owner of BigGovernment.org says the purpose of showing this speech was not to focus on Sherrod but to show the reaction of the NAACP audience as they giggled and laughed at her remarks prior to her statements condemning racism. In other words, Sherrod eventually talked in her speech that it is wrong to deny help to a farmer just because he was white. But before she made this confession, the audience thought it was a big joke denying this white farmer government assistance and thereby revealing their racism.
I suspect that Tom Vilsack, an Obama appointee and who is white with a life long record of attempting to endear himself to people like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other black civil rights activists will now have the tables tuned on him with demands of apology (which he should), demands of resignation (which he should) and accusation of being a racist (which he is not).
The accusation of someone being a racist is thrown around so much that it is loosing its meaning. (What ever that was?) Everyone who opposes special favors for Negroes such as (Affirmative Action), or want to protect our borders from the invasion of illegal aliens, or opposes Jewish domination in the movie industry or Zionist domination in our foreign diplomacy is accused of being a racist.
Even Glenn Beck who cannot do a single show without talking about how wonderful Martin Luther King was is accused of being a racist. So is Bill O’Rielly, Shawn Hannity, Ann Coulter.
I guess I am in good company!
Sherrod, however, contested the tape, claiming that the full content of the tape eventually shows that she eventually came to terms with those racist feelings and helped the white farmer that was seeking assistance.
Andrew Breitbart, owner of BigGovernment.org says the purpose of showing this speech was not to focus on Sherrod but to show the reaction of the NAACP audience as they giggled and laughed at her remarks prior to her statements condemning racism. In other words, Sherrod eventually talked in her speech that it is wrong to deny help to a farmer just because he was white. But before she made this confession, the audience thought it was a big joke denying this white farmer government assistance and thereby revealing their racism.
I suspect that Tom Vilsack, an Obama appointee and who is white with a life long record of attempting to endear himself to people like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other black civil rights activists will now have the tables tuned on him with demands of apology (which he should), demands of resignation (which he should) and accusation of being a racist (which he is not).
The accusation of someone being a racist is thrown around so much that it is loosing its meaning. (What ever that was?) Everyone who opposes special favors for Negroes such as (Affirmative Action), or want to protect our borders from the invasion of illegal aliens, or opposes Jewish domination in the movie industry or Zionist domination in our foreign diplomacy is accused of being a racist.
Even Glenn Beck who cannot do a single show without talking about how wonderful Martin Luther King was is accused of being a racist. So is Bill O’Rielly, Shawn Hannity, Ann Coulter.
I guess I am in good company!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
