Who is on the Lord's Side?

Pastor Terry Jones of the Dove World Outreach Center church in Gainesville, Florida has scheduled a Koran burning on September 11th, the ninth anniversary of 9/11.

As a result he has come under continued attack by Muslims worldwide. That is certainly understandable. However what is not understandable is Christian ministers condemning the burning of the Koran. Has their faith been so completely deluded that they can no longer take a stand for moral principle. Jesus Christ is either the one and only true God or he is not.

If Christians truly believe that Jesus Christ is God and the only name given under heaven from which we can obtain salvation than they should boldly say so. But most ministers act as if Jesus is simply offering a self-improvement program.

The fact is there are only two God’s (not many) There is Jesus Christ and there is Satan who leads the rebellion (Israel 14).

All non-Christian religions are from Satan. He is the great deceiver (Rev 20)! Christian ministers are falling all over themselves condemning Pastor Jones - a fellow Christian. And in doing so align themselves with Baal worship. When Moses came down from the mountain at the giving of he Ten Commandments, the people were committing worship of a golden calf. Moses asked them, “Who is on the Lord’s side.”

Where in the Bible are we told to “respect” false gods! In fact we are told to tear down their groves, destroy their idols and cast down their images.

Where in the Bible are we told to be “tolerant” of Baal worship?

I can certainly understand Muslims being offended. But if they are - perhaps they should pack their bags and move to a Muslim nation. But Christian ministers who slander a Christian brother just so they won’t offend a false god are not Christians but deceivers in the robes of a shepherd - I don’t care how many times they have been down the aisle or wept at the altar

Feds Sue Sheriff Arpaio in Civil Rights Probe

(from Newsmax)
The U.S. Justice Department sued Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Thursday, saying the Arizona lawman refused for more than a year to turn over records in an investigation into allegations his department discriminates against Hispanics.

The lawsuit calls Arpaio and his Maricopa County office's defiance "unprecedented," and said the federal government has been trying since March 2009 to get officials to comply with its probe of alleged discrimination, unconstitutional searches and seizures, and jail policies that discriminate against people with limited English skills.

Arpaio, who had been given until Aug. 17 to hand over documents the federal government asked for 15 months ago, called the Justice Department actions harassment.

His office has said it won't hand over additional documents because federal authorities haven't said exactly what they were investigating.

"They have hundreds of thousands of reports, hundreds of thousands," Arpaio said at a news conference Thursday morning in downtown Phoenix. "They're so broad, we're trying to narrow it down. We're trying to work with them."

The lawsuit is a ruse, Arpaio said.

"I think they know we have not been racial profiling, so what's the next step — camouflage the situation, go to the courts, and make it look like I'm not cooperating?" he said.

Arizona Republican Sen. Russell Pearce described the Justice Department's actions as a "witch hunt."

"This is the game that's played," he said. "They couldn't find any violations . . . that's why it's broad, that's why they're very vague about what they want. It doesn't take a very high IQ to figure out what's going on with these folks."

The lawsuit is the latest action against Arizona by the federal government, which earlier sued the state to stop its strict new immigration law that requires police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are in the country illegally.

"The actions of the sheriff's office are unprecedented," said Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the department's civil rights division. "It is unfortunate that the department was forced to resort to litigation to gain access to public documents and facilities."

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Phoenix, names Arpaio, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, and the county. It says the department is investigating police practices and jail policies but did not specify the documents sought in its dozens of requests.

Xochitl Hinojosa, a Justice Department spokeswoman in Washington, said she could not release information on the documents sought. "It is an ongoing investigation," she said.

Arpaio also declined to specify what documents the department is seeking. Arizona's new law, most of which a federal judge has put on hold, mirrors many of the policies Arpaio has put into place in the greater Phoenix area.

Arpaio believes the inquiry is focused on his immigration sweeps, patrols where deputies flood an area of a city — in some cases, heavily Latino areas — to seek out traffic violators and arrest other offenders.

Critics say his deputies pull people over for minor traffic infractions because of the color of their skin so they can ask them for proof of citizenship.

Arpaio denies allegations of racial profiling, saying people are stopped if deputies have probable cause to believe they've committed crimes — and only later do deputies find that many of them are illegal immigrants.

The sheriff's office has said half of the 1,032 people arrested in the sweeps have been illegal immigrants.

Last year, the federal government stripped Arpaio of his special power to enforce federal immigration law. The sheriff continued his sweeps through the enforcement of state immigration laws.

The department's lawsuit said Arpaio's office signed agreements promising to cooperate with civil-rights investigations and other reviews when it accepted federal law enforcement grants.

Last year, the nearly $113 million that the county government received from the federal government accounted for about 5 percent of the county's $2 billion budget. The lawsuit listed $16.5 million of funding provided Arpaio's office through several programs.

In a separate investigation, a federal grand jury in Phoenix is examining allegations that Arpaio has abused his powers with actions such as intimidating county workers by showing up at their homes at nights and on weekends.

A Hispanic activist said a federal judge might have to threaten jail time to get Arpaio to cooperate in the lawsuit filed Thursday.

Hispanics alleging racial profiling by Arpaio's deputies in a lawsuit already pending in federal court have met with resistance in their own document demands, said Lydia Guzman of the Phoenix-based civil rights group Somos America.

"It's going to take the hard hand of the judge to order some sanctions against the sheriff's office," Guzman said.

Duke for President

Here is a video you need to watch from David Duke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LczWm0Srxxk&feature=sub

One Person - Six Votes

Did you that a scheme is in place to allow "Hispanics" more votes than other people. You think that's fair. Well a black federal judge says it is. Watch, post what you think about this.

http://by148w.bay148.mail.live.com/default.aspx?wa=wsignin1.0

Lying Dirt Bag John McCain Buys GOP Primary

McCain spends $21 million on ads to fool voters in Arizona.

by James Buchanan

With the skill of a chameleon changing colors from blue to red, John McCain transformed himself from a whorish crook, who was part of the Keating Five, and from a CO-SPONSOR of the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill into a “respectable” conservative who “never” ever sponsored Amnesty. Remember those hundreds of billions of dollars in TARP bail outs that conservatives vehemently and loudly opposed, which McCain supported anyway. Well, it looks like McCain got plenty of kick backs. McCain just spent more than 21 million dollars to buy the GOP primary.

An [1] article by Michelle Malkin notes “Hayworth was far from a perfect candidate. But there is no bigger clown, charlatan, and huckster Republican serving on Capitol Hill than four-term, 24-year Big Government fixture John McCain. After burning through a whopping $21 million in campaign funds to hold on to his seat, McCain is poised to claim a primary election victory over Hayworth tonight. Some victory. To stave off Hayworth, the reborn conservative McCain not only had to throw $21 million down the drain. He had to thrown his own old ‘maverick’ self off the bus, start talking like Tom Tancredo, appear on cable news non-stop, disavow all his good friends in the ‘Eastern press’ whose approbation (praise) he thrives on in off-election years, and pander shamelessly to the grass-roots conservative base that he has despised, undermined, and spurned for more than two decades.”

It should be noted that most multi-term Senators breeze right through their primaries with almost no effort or expense. That’s because most Democrat Senators behave like liberals and most Republican Senators behave like conservatives except for the RINOs (Republicans in Name Only). And John McCain was the king of the RINOs. Since the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill, several RINO Senators who supported the Amnesty Bill have retired or chosen not to run. Two pro-Amnesty Republican Senators, Arlen Specter and Bob Bennett were hounded by the Tea Party in 2009 and 2010. Specter dropped out of the Republican Party and tried to run as a Democrat and still lost his primary race. Bennett tried to stay in the Republican Party and challenged the Tea Party, and lost with a pathetic 26 percent in his primary, finishing third.

Apparently John McCain learned from the Bob Bennett fiasco and decided to spend, spend, spend and lie, lie, lie. Rather than defend the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill, McCain would look right into the camera and say with a straight face to all the gullible retirees and forgetful moderates “I never supported an Amnesty.”

In a Clintonesque world where “is” doesn’t mean “is,” McCain would probably argue that the minor speed bumps he suggested in his “path to citizenship” made the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill, not an Amnesty Bill. In the real world however, John McCain and Ted Kennedy wanted every single illegal alien in the US in 2007 to get US citizenship. The tiny hurdles they proposed for 20 million illegal aliens were actually nothing compared to the massive paperwork and expense that a legal immigrant from Europe would have to go through to get US citizenship. The Democrats want these illegals to be made citizens since about 80 percent of Latinos vote Democrat, and McCain supported this betrayal of conservative Americans because he was being paid off by big corporations to flood the labor market with cheap Latino workers.

This primary was a Pyrrhic victory for McCain. He may have won the battle, but the cost of victory was so great; it will be devastating for McCain’s future. He has promised his voters that he will be a good conservative and that he’ll be tough on illegals (while no doubt promising the complete opposite to his corporate sponsors). From now on, there’s a spotlight on McCain to see if he’ll keep his word, and he probably won’t. After a few months, he’ll start turning back into his old liberal self and forget all those promises to the voters –after all those were just “words”.

When McCain strays back to his usual liberal self, there will be a recall effort against him. 41 percent of the Republican primary voters are already sick of McCain and would be more than happy to participate in a recall. If a significant percent of McCain’s support base feel they’ve been betrayed, then it’s “Recall Time” and I don’t think McCain’s sponsors will be willing to spend another $21 million dollars to protect his wrinkled old butt from another serious challenge.

Listen to this Important Message

I am sorry I haven't written on my blog for a few days. We are getting ready for our National Klan Leadership Conference also I will be traveling to Washington DC. on Monday and returning on Tuesday.
If you are able to listen to our Sunday morning church service you can do so by clicking here: www.ChristianRevivalCenter.net at 11 AM Central Time. The title of my message is How Fast Can You Run.

Distorting Reality

The only thing falling faster than Obama’s approval rating is Miley Cyrus’s wholesome image which is at zero. Obama’s approval rating is now at 41%. Bush the Second’s approval rating didn’t reach this low until his second term after Katrina.

But how do these approval ratings break down according to race. Blacks and other minorities put Obama in office. And their love for Obama still makes them sing the high notes. They adore him and get giggly when someone whispers his name. However, many whites who voted for Obama have now had second thoughts. They thought he was going to champion traditional American values like independence and self-reliance. However, they were mistaken. It was the minority voters who took Obama to the prom and so he is going to make sure that they get all the dances. Among Blacks Obama’s approval rate is 93%. However among whites his approval rating has dropped from 62% to 37%.

This is why when the Tea Party or some other conservative group holds a rally there are more blacks on stage than in the audience. They need to put minorities center stage in an attempt to prove they aren’t toothless redneck racist from the hill country. Trying to spot a black person at a Tea Party event is like thinking Mr. McGoo will make an outstanding baseball umpire.

As smart as O’Rielly, Hannity, Beck may be, it is apparent that they just cannot connect the dots on the issue of race in America. Without question there are two Americas. There is the old America (white) which embraces the idealism of our colonial forefathers and their independent spirit then there is the new America (non white) which embraces the nanny state.

Yes, I know there is some cross over.

National conservative spokesmen scratch their heads trying to figure out why Negroes, Hispanics etc support causes which are anathema to white Americans.

It is simple to see once you are willing to do so that traditional America, that which is valued by tea party people cannot be maintained if America does not remain a white country. Fill America’s schools, churches and communities with Mexicans means that America will look like Mexico and will become a 3rd world country. The same can be said with all other races. America will not retain the image of our forefathers if the streets, churches, schools and communities become occupied by Mongs, Arabs, Mexicans, Cambodians, Negroes, Filipinos etc.
It isn’t that I hate any of those people, but why should we surrender the country built by our forefathers and given to us as an inheritance?

I believe the vast majority of Tea Party people do not hate Negroes or other minorities. But I also believe the vast majority are like me. They simply would rather be around white people. And that is enough to be called a racist.

However, I find it both annoying and humorous that there are attempts to make it look like the Tea Party people are a happy multi-racial awakening. As I stated, there are usually more black people speaking at Tea Party events then there are black people in the entire audience.

Watch this video to see an example of this distortion. Blacks are center stage on this documentary about the Tea Party. www.americanvision.com/teapartythedocumentaryfilm.aspx?utm_source=Specials&utm_campaign=6d940c87ea-American_Vision_Store_Special_8_9&utm_medium=email