Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Not a Surprise!

Ok! It shouldn't’t be a surprise. A federal judge has declared most of the Arizona law to be unconstitutional. According to our custom we all are suppose to bow before the court’s ruling. However, we often fail to understand that the court is not the highest branch of government ruling over all others. We are a constitutional REPUBLIC with three branches of government. All EQUAL! It is the Constitution and not the court that is the supreme law of the land. The court has no constitutional authority to force its will upon the legislative or executive branches of government. Likewise the legislature cannot force its will upon the court. In other words, congress cannot pass a law forcing the court on how it should rule. Even so, Constitutionally the court does not have authority to force its will upon the legislature. The Arizona law (SB1070) was passed by the legislature of the state and the enforcement of the law is carried out by the governor (executive). The court has an opinion-that’s all they have. If they are able to force their opinion against the will of the legislature and the will of the executive then we not longer a republic but an oligarchy dictatorship of the court.

Each branch of government has equal power. The legislature passes laws, the executive branch carries out laws passed by the legislature and the court gives their opinion. The executive is not authorized to force court opinion on the people or else we live in a dictatorship and the will of the people is under the heel of tyranny.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Defense Against Invasion

The State of Arizona has been sued by the Obama administration because the citizens of Arizona feel the need to safe guard their borders. Obama and others deny that Arizona has that right.

But what DOES our U. S. Constitution say? Take a look!

Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Is Tom Vilsack a Secret Racist?

We certainly have now heard the story of Shirley Sherrod’s dismissal from the Department of Agriculture. She was the black women who while speaking before the NAACP in March revealed racist feelings she had while dealing with a white farmer over 20 years ago. A video tape of her speech was shown on which immediately resulted in her dismissal by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

Sherrod, however, contested the tape, claiming that the full content of the tape eventually shows that she eventually came to terms with those racist feelings and helped the white farmer that was seeking assistance.

Andrew Breitbart, owner of says the purpose of showing this speech was not to focus on Sherrod but to show the reaction of the NAACP audience as they giggled and laughed at her remarks prior to her statements condemning racism. In other words, Sherrod eventually talked in her speech that it is wrong to deny help to a farmer just because he was white. But before she made this confession, the audience thought it was a big joke denying this white farmer government assistance and thereby revealing their racism.

I suspect that Tom Vilsack, an Obama appointee and who is white with a life long record of attempting to endear himself to people like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other black civil rights activists will now have the tables tuned on him with demands of apology (which he should), demands of resignation (which he should) and accusation of being a racist (which he is not).

The accusation of someone being a racist is thrown around so much that it is loosing its meaning. (What ever that was?) Everyone who opposes special favors for Negroes such as (Affirmative Action), or want to protect our borders from the invasion of illegal aliens, or opposes Jewish domination in the movie industry or Zionist domination in our foreign diplomacy is accused of being a racist.

Even Glenn Beck who cannot do a single show without talking about how wonderful Martin Luther King was is accused of being a racist. So is Bill O’Rielly, Shawn Hannity, Ann Coulter.

I guess I am in good company!

Friday, July 16, 2010

Muti-Culturalism and the Death of Civilization

We are continually hammered about how wonderful multi-culturalism is. But history has shown that multi-cultural (read multi-racial) societies do not last very long. They are simply a short period of time as one dominant culture gives way to another dominant culture. America was a white dominant nation from its inception in 1607 until the later part of the 1900's. Now America is undergoing a great racial and cultural shift. America will soon look like Mexico.

Britain is undergoing the same transition. On the world scene white people made up about 50% of the world's population only a short hundred years ago. Then as a result of white guilt and white generosity, (health care, food baskets etc) the non white populations began to grow (explode). Today, the white race is only about 10% of the world's population and the world is broke, hungry and in chaos. There is just too many of them for us to feed!

There are people beginning to realise that multi-racial societies is good for minorities, but not good for our people. Some people wake up early and are called racist by those yet asleep, but more and more people are beginning to see that it just doesn't work and as to the racist label, it is tossed around so much that it is beginning to lose its meaning.

Here is a good video:

Monday, July 5, 2010

Even Steven Spielberg Couldn't Make This Up!

NASA, you know the agency that took us to the moon is being given a new assignment. They are suppose to help improve U.S. relationships with the Muslim world. As part of their assignment they will be working on some feel good therapy, helping Muslim nations feel good about their contributions to science.

Here is the Story fromFOX News

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a recent interview that his "foremost" mission as the head of America's space exploration agency is to improve relations with the Muslim world.

Though international diplomacy would seem well outside NASA's orbit, Bolden said in an interview with Al Jazeera that strengthening those ties was among the top tasks President Obama assigned him. He said better interaction with the Muslim world would ultimately advance space travel.

"When I became the NASA administrator -- or before I became the NASA administrator -- he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering," Bolden said in the interview.

The NASA administrator was in the Middle East last month marking the one-year anniversary since Obama delivered an address to Muslim nations in Cairo. Bolden spoke in June at the American University in Cairo -- in his interview with Al Jazeera, he described space travel as an international collaboration of which Muslim nations must be a part.

"It is a matter of trying to reach out and get the best of all worlds, if you will, and there is much to be gained by drawing in the contributions that are possible from the Muslim (nations)," he said. He held up the International Space Station as a model, praising the contributions there from the Russians and the Chinese.

However, Bolden denied the suggestion that he was on a diplomatic mission -- in a distinctly non-diplomatic role.

"Not at all. It's not a diplomatic anything," he said.

He said the United States is not going to travel beyond low-Earth orbit on its own and that no country is going to make it to Mars without international help.

Bolden has faced criticism this year for overseeing the cancellation of the agency's Constellation program, which was building new rockets and spaceships capable of returning astronauts to the moon. Stressing the importance of international cooperation in future missions, Bolden told Al Jazeera that the moon, Mars and asteroids are still planned destinations for NASA.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Yes or No!

I often receive comments to this blog from an individual who comments under the name Norwegian. He recently sent a comment that I am placing here along with my reply. The comment he makes is in reply to yesterday's blog titled, Those who DO are outnumbered by those who DON'T!

Norwegian writes:
The only way I could view this a legitimate race issue would be if all white people in California were employed, and if all Hispanic immigrants were taking advantage of the system. Since there are workers and non-workers on both sides of the racial divide, and since both whites and non would lose their benefits under your suggestion, it really can't be considered a race issue. As it stands, I'd say it's more of an issue of productive workers supporting the unemployed and being taken advantage of by the freeloaders. You can disagree with welfare/handouts without addressing race, and refrain from alienating so many people.You could also cite your source for the article excerpt.I'm also curious s to what the title is referencing.

My reply:

My Dear Mr. Norwegian:
You make the same mistake that most detractors of White Nationalism make. You make assumptions based upon misinformation that is spoon fed you by the national media and the entertainment industry.

The assumption is that White Nationalists think all white people are good and all non-white people are bad. Or even worse, they assume the absurdity that we hate anyone that isn't white. Believe me, I have traveled in every state of the union except for Hawaii and I have been shown kindness and consideration by many non whites. I am well aware that there are many good people of color. I am also aware that there are many vile and spiritually ugly white people such as Joran Van de Sloot.

When we discuss the race issue it does not mean we are implying that all non-whites are bad people. But there is a greater proportion of violent crime committed by non-whites. That is why even liberals and egalitarians stay out of black neighborhoods. It is foolish to argue otherwise because you can not name a "bad" white neighborhood. They don't exist.

I know that detractors to the above statement will make the claim that white neighborhoods are not safe for black people. There certainly may be a rare occasion when this is the case, but for the most part that is even a false statement.

The trouble with black neighborhoods is that not only are they unsafe for white people to travel in, but they are also unsafe for other blacks. Young black girls live in fear of being sexually assaulted in a darkened hallway or a deserted alley. Elderly black people live in fear behind bolted doors because the neighborhoods have been taken over by the gang bangers.

The issue is race! This does not mean that we think all blacks (Mexicans, etc) are bad and all whites are good. But you have to view race as a corporate entity. Consider the example I gave a while back about snakes. Very few people are bitten by snakes each year and there are approximately only 10 rattlesnake related deaths each year. Does this mean all rattlesnakes are dangerous - yes. Are all snakes dangerous - No! But if a person does not know how to tell the difference then it is best to stay away from all snakes. And the reason only a few people are injured by rattlesnakes each year is because people are wise enough to stay away from them. Those who don't heed the warning run the danger of becoming a statistic.

There are approximately 32,000 white women sexually assaulted each year by Negroes. Walter Williams, a black economic professor at George Mason University and widely read syndicated columnist stated that blacks are 10 times more likely to commit a violent crime against whites than whites would be to commit a violent crime against blacks. Those who don't heed the warning run the danger of becoming a statistic.
You can read his article here:

The story of California entitlement programs is deplorable. Certainly there are many whites people who abuse the system and certainly there are many non-whites who are hard working and who do not abuse the system. But when you look at the corporate body of race there can be no honest denial that the vast entitlement programs such as public housing, welfare, Aid to Dependant Children, health care, food subsidies, and crime are dominated by non-whites. The huge influx of illegal aliens is a drain on our national economy.

Sure there are many nice black people. There are also many nice people among all the nonwhite races. Who said there wasn't?

I am sure you have nice nonwhite friends. But it doesn't make bad neighborhoods any safer! And it doesn't alter the fact that illegal aliens and even legal citizens whose very existence depend on the generous help from the nation's producers are a drain on the California as well as the national economy.

I stated a couple of days ago that you don't love your people and you said that you do. So let me ask it this way, "Would you care if your people ceased to exist?"

It shouldn't take a lengthy answer of mish mash - a simpl yes or no will suffice.

Those who Do are outnumbered by those who DON'T

A recent news story begins this way . . .

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's order to pay 200,000 state workers just the minimum wage sent a signal to California lawmakers: In the impasse over closing California's $19 billion budget deficit, Schwarzenegger is ready to play hardball.

If he REALLY wants to play hardball, don't cut the pay of those that are working. Cut the benefits going to illegal aliens. California is almost 20 billion dollars in debt. It is going bankrupt. Remove the benefits illegals get such as education benefits, health care benefits, housing benefits etc. All of these free benefits are being paid for by California workers.

If these benefits were cut, millions could be saved in law enforcement, prisons etc. But they are afraid to mention this. The worse it get (and it is getting worse) the more people will move to the foundation of White Nationalism. The entitlement programs are no longere sustainable. Those who do not produce have out populated those who do.

The issue is and has always been race. It will remain so.

I am sorry if some of you don't understand it. In time you will!